Difference between revisions of "News/H.264 Plus vs. H.264"

(Experiment)
(Experiment)
Line 29: Line 29:
 
===Experiment===
 
===Experiment===
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
|+Still Image
+
|+Storage
 
|-
 
|-
|x
+
|'''H.264 Plus codec on:'''
|x
+
|'''H.264 Plus codec off:'''
 
|-
 
|-
|x
+
|Still Scene: 16158 KB
|x
+
|Still Scene: 40822 KB
 
|-
 
|-
|x
+
|Moving Scene: 37351 KB
|x
+
|Moving Scene: 47338 KB
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 +
  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
|+Video with Movement
+
|+Network Traffic
|-
+
|'''H.264 Plus codec on:'''
|x
+
|'''H.264 Plus codec off:'''
|x
 
 
|-
 
|-
|x
+
|Still Scene: 180 Kbps per stream
|x
+
|Still Scene: 300 Kbps per stream
 
|-
 
|-
|x
+
|Moving Scene: 790 Kbps per stream
|x
+
|Moving Scene: 950 Kbps per stream
 
|}
 
|}
  

Revision as of 17:28, 29 August 2016

H.264+ Smart Codec vs H.264

Here are my finding, attached are the graphs and metrics I have taken: Storage (using SD card file size): Comparison Smart Codec vs No Smart Codec:

Still: 60.42% Decreased file size

Movement: 21.10% Decreased file size

Network (using solar winds on SNMP): Comparison Smart Codec vs No Smart Codec:

Still: 40% Decreased stream throughput

Movement (using LPR wheel): 16.84% Decreased stream

Observation

  • How much bandwidth does Dahua's new H.264+ Smart Codec save compared to H.264?
  • What are the shortcomings, if any, to using H.264+ Smart Codec?
  • What equipment is required to take advantage of H.264+ Smart Codec?

Hypothesis

H.264+ Smart Codec will be more efficient than H.264. I expect a reduction of 20-50% in bandwidth over H.264.

Experiment

Storage
H.264 Plus codec on: H.264 Plus codec off:
Still Scene: 16158 KB Still Scene: 40822 KB
Moving Scene: 37351 KB Moving Scene: 47338 KB


Network Traffic
H.264 Plus codec on: H.264 Plus codec off:
Still Scene: 180 Kbps per stream Still Scene: 300 Kbps per stream
Moving Scene: 790 Kbps per stream Moving Scene: 950 Kbps per stream

Theory

Prediction

Evaluation from Community