Difference between revisions of "News/H.264 Plus vs. H.264"

(Observation)
(Experiment)
Line 28: Line 28:
  
 
===Experiment===
 
===Experiment===
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|+Still Image
 +
|-
 +
|x
 +
|x
 +
|-
 +
|x
 +
|x
 +
|-
 +
|x
 +
|x
 +
|}
 +
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|+Video with Movement
 +
|-
 +
|x
 +
|x
 +
|-
 +
|x
 +
|x
 +
|-
 +
|x
 +
|x
 +
|}
 +
 
===Theory===
 
===Theory===
 
===Prediction===
 
===Prediction===
 
===Evaluation from Community===
 
===Evaluation from Community===

Revision as of 16:51, 29 August 2016

H.264+ Smart Codec vs H.264

Here are my finding, attached are the graphs and metrics I have taken: Storage (using SD card file size): Comparison Smart Codec vs No Smart Codec:

Still: 60.42% Decreased file size

Movement: 21.10% Decreased file size

Network (using solar winds on SNMP): Comparison Smart Codec vs No Smart Codec:

Still: 40% Decreased stream throughput

Movement (using LPR wheel): 16.84% Decreased stream

Observation

  • How much bandwidth does Dahua's new H.264+ Smart Codec save compared to H.264?
  • What are the shortcomings, if any, to using H.264+ Smart Codec?
  • What equipment is required to take advantage of H.264+ Smart Codec?

Hypothesis

H.264+ Smart Codec will be more efficient than H.264. I expect a reduction of 20-50% in bandwidth over H.264.

Experiment

Still Image
x x
x x
x x
Video with Movement
x x
x x
x x

Theory

Prediction

Evaluation from Community