Difference between revisions of "News/H.264 Plus vs. H.264"
(→Hypothesis) |
(→Observation) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
===Observation=== | ===Observation=== | ||
| − | How much bandwidth does Dahua's new H.264+ Smart Codec save compared to H.264? What are the shortcomings, if any, to using H.264+ Smart Codec? | + | *How much bandwidth does Dahua's new H.264+ Smart Codec save compared to H.264? |
| + | *What are the shortcomings, if any, to using H.264+ Smart Codec? | ||
| + | *What equipment is required to take advantage of H.264+ Smart Codec? | ||
===Hypothesis=== | ===Hypothesis=== | ||
Revision as of 16:48, 29 August 2016
Contents
H.264+ Smart Codec vs H.264
Here are my finding, attached are the graphs and metrics I have taken: Storage (using SD card file size): Comparison Smart Codec vs No Smart Codec:
Still: 60.42% Decreased file size
Movement: 21.10% Decreased file size
Network (using solar winds on SNMP): Comparison Smart Codec vs No Smart Codec:
Still: 40% Decreased stream throughput
Movement (using LPR wheel): 16.84% Decreased stream
Observation
- How much bandwidth does Dahua's new H.264+ Smart Codec save compared to H.264?
- What are the shortcomings, if any, to using H.264+ Smart Codec?
- What equipment is required to take advantage of H.264+ Smart Codec?
Hypothesis
H.264+ Smart Codec will be more efficient than H.264. I expect a reduction of 20-50% in bandwidth over H.264.
